A lawyer used ChatGPT to cite bogus cases. What are the ethics?

  • A New York lawyer submitted a brief citing six non-existent judicial decisions produced by ChatGPT
  • Lawyers must ensure competency and confidentiality when using AI, experts warn

May 30(Reuters) – A New York lawyer is facing potential sanctions over an error-riddled brief he drafted with help from ChatGPT.

It’s a scenario legal ethics experts have warned about since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in November, marking a new era for AI that can produce human-like responses based on vast amounts of data.

Steven Schwartz of Levidow, Levidow & Oberman faces a June 8 sanctions hearing before U.S….

Read more on google

About bourbiza mohamed

Check Also

The threat of wildfires is rising. So is new artificial intelligence solutions to fight them

LONDON (AP) — Wildfires fueled by climate change have ravaged communities from Maui to the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *